SK Innovation board says no costly settlement with LG

SK Innovation's first EV battery plant under construction in the US state of Georgia
SK Innovation's first EV battery plant under construction in the US state of Georgia
Jae-Kwang Ahn 2
2021-03-11 20:04:02 ahnjk@hankyung.com
EV batteries

SK Innovation Inc.’s board members on Thursday advised the South Korean electric vehicle battery maker not to pay hefty compensation for a settlement with LG Energy Solution Ltd. over the two companies' trade secret infringement dispute and instead, called on its top management to hire a global conflict expert and bolster its compliance monitoring system.

SK Innovation convened an extended audit committee meeting on Mar. 11, which all of its board members attended, to address the US International Trade Commission's (ITC) ruling last month against SK over alleged trade secret misappropriation.

At the meeting, the committee members reprimanded SK’s top management for failing to properly handle the judicial proceedings in the US. They claimed that the US commission didn't touch on the core issue of the dispute – whether SK infringed on LG’s trade secrets – but called into question SK deleting relevant documents. 

“It was regretful that SK lost the case without having an opportunity to defend itself against the allegations of trade secret misappropriation, the key issue of the lawsuit,” said Choi Wooseok, head of SK Innovation’s audit committee and a Korea University accounting professor.

"What is the most urgent and important thing for SK Innovation is to upgrade its compliance system to the global level, at a time when it is pushing for global expansion," Choi said during the meeting.  

After reviewing proposed options to reach a settlement with LG Energy, the committee concluded not to accept LG's demand if it would significantly undermine SK’s business competitiveness.

LG Energy is demanding around 3 trillion won ($2.7 billion) in compensation to settle the dispute.

They called on SK Innovation executives to hire a global conflict expert from outside and revamp its response system to global lawsuits so that the company can build a perfect compliance monitoring system.

The decision by SK Innovation's board drew  backlash from LG Energy Solution, which issued a statement on Thursday criticizing SK's response to the ITC ruling.

But LG left a door open for negotiation with its local rival, saying: “If they come to the negotiating table with sincerity, there are various ways to pay compensation such as cash, royalties or an equity stake.”  

SK Innovation has asked the US government to veto the ITC's verdict by the Apr. 11 deadline. If denied, industry watchers said the company may threaten to withdraw from the US where it is currently building two EV battery plants in the state of Georgia.

Write to Jae-Kwang Ahn at ahnjk@hankyung.com
Yeonhee Kim edited this article.

US' ITC says 10-year import ban on SK not excessive

US' ITC says 10-year import ban on SK not excessive

The US International Trade Commission (ITC) has stated that the 10-year exclusion order prohibiting SK Innovation Co. from importing battery products to the US is not excessive, in a public opinion report on the trade secret dispute between LG Energy Solution Ltd. and SK Innovation.Last month,

US politicians urge review of ITC ruling over LG, SK battery dispute

US politicians urge review of ITC ruling over LG, SK battery dispute

SK Innovation's first EV battery plant under construction in Georgia, US The trade secret dispute between LG Energy Solution Ltd. and SK Innovation Co. is taking a new turn as US state politicians raise their voices against the recent US International Trade Commission (ITC) ruling, calling for

SK under increasing pressure for costly settlement with LG

SK under increasing pressure for costly settlement with LG

SK Innovation Co. may brace for a billion-dollar settlement with LG Energy Solution Co., after it lost a lengthy legal battle with its hometown rival over alleged trade secret infringement for electric vehicle batteries.   In its final verdict over the civil case, the US Internation

(* comment hide *}